In a surprising turn of events, the National Council on Problem Gambling (NCPG) has announced that it will remain neutral on the controversial Stop Predatory Gambling Act, also known as the SAFE Bet. This decision has sparked outrage from the American Gaming Association (AGA), who has called the NCPG’s stance a “slap in the face” to the gaming industry.
The SAFE Bet, introduced by Senator Tom Cotton and Congressman Jerry Nadler, seeks to ban online gambling and enforce stricter regulations on the industry. Supporters of the bill argue that it is necessary to protect consumers from predatory practices and prevent problem gambling.
However, the NCPG, a non-profit organization dedicated to helping individuals and families affected by problem gambling, has chosen not to take a stance on the legislation. In a statement released earlier this week, the NCPG explained that while they support efforts to address problem gambling, they believe that the SAFE Bet is a complex issue that requires further study and consideration.
The NCPG’s decision has been met with criticism from the AGA, a trade association representing the casino industry. In a scathing response, AGA President and CEO Bill Miller accused the NCPG of prioritizing its own interests over those of problem gamblers.
“By remaining neutral on the SAFE Bet, the NCPG is failing to fulfill its mission of protecting those who are most vulnerable to gambling addiction,” Miller said. “This is a slap in the face to problem gamblers and their families who rely on the NCPG for support and guidance.”
The NCPG has defended its position, emphasizing that they are committed to addressing problem gambling in a responsible and thoughtful manner. The organization has pledged to continue working with industry stakeholders and policymakers to find solutions that benefit both consumers and the gaming industry.
As the debate over the SAFE Bet continues to unfold, it remains to be seen how the NCPG’s neutrality will impact the future of the legislation. In the meantime, advocates on both sides of the issue are gearing up for a heated battle in Congress as they seek to shape the future of online gambling regulation in the United States. Overall, this development underscores the complexities and challenges that surround the issue of problem gambling and the need for a balanced and nuanced approach to regulation.
