In a move that has sparked controversy and divided opinions, the state of New Jersey and a powerful union have jointly filed a motion to dismiss a lawsuit targeting Atlantic City casinos for violating the state’s smoking ban.
The lawsuit, initially filed by a group of non-smoking casino employees, alleges that the casinos have been allowing patrons to smoke indoors in violation of the state’s Smoke-Free Air Act. The act, which was passed in 2006, prohibits smoking in enclosed public spaces, including casinos.
However, the state and the union, which represents thousands of casino workers, argue that the lawsuit is without merit and should be dismissed. They claim that the casinos have taken extensive measures to ensure compliance with the smoking ban, including the installation of designated smoking areas and ventilation systems to remove smoke from the gaming floors.
In a statement, New Jersey’s Attorney General stated that the state “strongly supports the Smoke-Free Air Act and its enforcement, but this lawsuit simply does not hold water.” The union echoed this sentiment, emphasizing that the health and safety of its members is a top priority and that the casinos have been diligent in their efforts to provide a smoke-free environment.
Opponents of the lawsuit, however, have raised concerns about the potential health risks associated with exposure to secondhand smoke in the casinos. They argue that the smoking ban was implemented to protect both employees and patrons from the harmful effects of smoking and that any violations should be taken seriously.
The outcome of the motion to dismiss remains to be seen, but it is clear that this case has reignited the debate over smoking regulations in Atlantic City casinos. As the legal battle unfolds, both sides are preparing for a contentious fight that could have far-reaching implications for the gaming industry in New Jersey.
