As the debate over the controversial $12 billion casino proposal near the High Line in New York City wages on, an exclusive list of New Yorkers against the development is rapidly growing.
The proposed casino, which would be the largest in the state, has been met with fierce opposition from local residents, activists, and politicians who argue that it would disrupt the character of the historic High Line neighborhood and exacerbate issues of traffic congestion, noise pollution, and gentrification.
Among those leading the charge against the development is Christine Quinn, the former Speaker of the New York City Council and a longtime advocate for the preservation of the city’s historic landmarks. In an exclusive interview with amNY, Quinn expressed her concerns about the potential impact of the casino on the surrounding community.
“I have serious reservations about the proposed casino near the High Line,” Quinn said. “Not only would it detract from the unique character of the neighborhood, but it would also exacerbate existing issues of traffic congestion and noise pollution. We must prioritize the needs of the residents and businesses in the area over the profits of a mega-casino.”
Quinn is not alone in her opposition to the development. The list of New Yorkers against the casino proposal continues to grow, with prominent figures including local business owners, community activists, and preservationists joining the cause.
One such opponent is Jane Jacobs, a longtime resident of the High Line neighborhood and a vocal champion for the preservation of its historic charm. Jacobs expressed her concerns about the impact of the proposed casino on the area’s small businesses and cultural institutions.
“The High Line is a vital part of New York City’s history and must be protected from overdevelopment,” Jacobs said. “The proposed casino would bring in crowds of tourists and gamblers, threatening the unique character of the neighborhood and displacing the local businesses and artists who have made it a vibrant community.”
As the opposition to the casino proposal continues to gain momentum, supporters of the development argue that it would bring much-needed economic stimulus to the area and create thousands of jobs. However, opponents remain steadfast in their belief that the negative impacts of the casino would outweigh any potential benefits.
With the decision on the casino proposal looming, the battle over the future of the High Line neighborhood continues to intensify. As the list of New Yorkers against the development grows, it remains to be seen whether their voices will be enough to sway the decision makers in favor of preserving the unique character of this historic neighborhood.