The Queensland gambling regulator is facing intense scrutiny and criticism following its controversial decision last week to grant a new casino licence in Brisbane. The move has sparked outrage among anti-gambling advocates, politicians, and community groups who argue that the decision is a step backward in the effort to curb problem gambling in the state.
The decision to award the new casino licence to a joint venture between the Star Entertainment Group and Hong Kong-based Chow Tai Fook Enterprises has come under fire for a variety of reasons. Critics argue that the regulator failed to adequately assess the potential social impacts of a new casino in Brisbane, including the potential for increased problem gambling, crime, and social harm.
In a statement released following the announcement of the new licence, Queensland Premier Annastacia Palaszczuk defended the regulator’s decision, stating that it had undergone a rigorous assessment process and had taken all relevant factors into consideration. However, many remain unconvinced and are calling for a full inquiry into the decision-making process.
One of the most vocal critics of the decision is Tim Costello, chief advocate for the Alliance for Gambling Reform, who has accused the regulator of putting profits ahead of the well-being of Queenslanders. Costello argues that the decision to grant a new casino licence in Brisbane flies in the face of the state government’s commitment to reducing the harm caused by gambling.
In response to the backlash, the gambling regulator has defended its decision, stating that it believes the new casino will bring economic benefits to the state and create thousands of jobs. However, this argument has done little to placate critics who argue that the social costs of problem gambling far outweigh any potential economic gains.
The controversy surrounding the new casino licence in Brisbane comes at a time when gambling addiction rates are on the rise in Queensland, with recent studies indicating that problem gambling is a growing concern in the state. Many fear that the addition of a new casino in Brisbane will only exacerbate this issue and lead to more individuals and families experiencing the devastating consequences of gambling addiction.
As calls for a full inquiry into the regulator’s decision mount, it remains to be seen what action, if any, will be taken to address the concerns raised by anti-gambling advocates and community groups. In the meantime, the controversy serves as a stark reminder of the ongoing debate surrounding the regulation of gambling in Queensland and the need for a balanced approach that prioritizes the well-being of all residents.
