The wildly popular mobile game, Royal Match, has come under fire for allegedly violating gambling laws and exploiting users into spending exorbitant amounts of money on in-game purchases. A class action lawsuit has been filed against the game’s developers, Playgendary Limited, claiming that the game’s mechanics are designed to trigger addictive behavior and encourage players to engage in what is essentially gambling.
According to the lawsuit, Royal Match presents players with a series of match-3 puzzles that they must complete in order to progress through the game. However, players are given a limited number of turns to solve each puzzle, and once these turns are exhausted, they are prompted to purchase more turns using real money. The lawsuit alleges that this creates a sense of urgency and compels players to spend money in order to continue playing.
In addition to this, the lawsuit claims that Royal Match employs a system of loot boxes, which are virtual containers that players can purchase in the hopes of receiving rare or valuable in-game items. The lawsuit argues that this mechanic is akin to gambling, as players are essentially wagering money for a chance at winning a prize.
The class action lawsuit was filed on behalf of all players who have spent money on Royal Match’s in-game purchases, and seeks compensation for damages incurred as a result of the game’s alleged predatory practices. The lawsuit also calls for Playgendary Limited to be held accountable for violating gambling laws and for failing to disclose the potential risks associated with playing the game.
In response to the lawsuit, Playgendary Limited issued a statement denying the allegations and asserting that Royal Match is a lawful and legitimate game that complies with all relevant regulations. The developers argued that the in-game purchases are optional and that players are not required to spend money in order to enjoy the game.
Despite Playgendary Limited’s defense, the class action lawsuit has gained traction among players who feel that they have been taken advantage of by the game’s manipulative mechanics. Many users have reported spending hundreds or even thousands of dollars on in-game purchases, only to find themselves unable to resist the urge to continue spending.
As the lawsuit moves forward, it raises important questions about the ethics and legality of in-game purchases in mobile games, and serves as a reminder of the potential risks that can arise when developers prioritize profits over player well-being. Royal Match may have captivated millions of players with its engaging gameplay and colorful graphics, but the allegations of exploitation and manipulation threaten to tarnish the game’s reputation and hold its developers accountable for their actions.
