The Arkansas state attorney general, Leslie Rutledge, has responded to a lawsuit challenging the legality of a proposed constitutional amendment that would expand casino gambling in the state. The lawsuit, filed by a group opposed to the amendment, argues that the language of the amendment is misleading and would violate the state constitution.
In a statement released to the Northwest Arkansas Democrat-Gazette, Rutledge defended the amendment, saying that it was drafted in accordance with the state’s constitution and that the language was clear and transparent. She also stated that the amendment had been vetted by the attorney general’s office and approved for the ballot.
The proposed constitutional amendment, known as Issue 4, would authorize the construction and operation of casinos in Benton, Boone, Miller, and Pulaski counties. It would also permit the expansion of casino gambling at the Oaklawn Racing Casino Resort in Hot Springs and Southland Gaming and Racing in West Memphis.
The lawsuit against the amendment was filed by a group called Committee to Protect Arkansas’ Values/Stop Casinos Now. The group argues that the language of the amendment is misleading because it does not clearly state that the casinos would be operated by a single company. They also claim that the amendment violates the state constitution by granting exclusive rights to operate casinos to specific entities.
Rutledge’s response to the lawsuit comes as the November election approaches, with voters set to decide on several ballot measures, including Issue 4. Supporters of the amendment argue that it would generate tax revenue for the state and create new jobs, while opponents fear that it would lead to an increase in gambling addiction and social problems.
The lawsuit is set to be heard in court in the coming weeks, as both sides continue to make their case for and against the casino expansion. In the meantime, voters will have the opportunity to weigh in on the issue and decide the future of gambling in Arkansas.
