The battle against smoking in Atlantic City casinos has taken a contentious turn as a union representing casino workers has asked a judge to dismiss a lawsuit that aims to ban smoking in the gambling establishments.
The lawsuit, filed by a group of health advocates and former casino employees, argues that secondhand smoke poses a serious health risk to both employees and patrons of the casinos. It specifically targets Atlantic City’s eight casinos, noting that they are the only indoor venues in New Jersey where smoking is still allowed.
The union, Unite Here Local 54, which represents thousands of casino workers in Atlantic City, has intervened in the case, arguing that a ban on smoking would harm the casinos’ business and ultimately lead to job losses for its members.
In a statement, Bob McDevitt, president of Unite Here Local 54, said, “Our members rely on the revenue generated by the casinos to support their families. A smoking ban would undoubtedly hurt their livelihoods.”
The union also points out that many of its members work in areas of the casinos where smoking is not allowed, such as hotel rooms and dining establishments. They argue that these non-smoking areas provide a safe environment for employees and customers who wish to avoid exposure to secondhand smoke.
The lawsuit has sparked debate among Atlantic City residents and casino goers, with opinions on both sides of the issue. Some argue that a smoking ban is necessary to protect the health of workers and patrons, while others believe that it would ultimately hurt the casinos’ bottom line.
In response to the lawsuit, the casinos have implemented strict ventilation systems and designated smoking areas to minimize the impact of secondhand smoke. They argue that a blanket ban on smoking would drive customers away and result in a significant loss of revenue.
The judge overseeing the case is expected to make a decision on whether to dismiss the lawsuit in the coming weeks. In the meantime, the debate over smoking in Atlantic City casinos continues to rage on, with both sides digging in their heels for what promises to be a protracted legal battle.
